Showing posts with label Matthew 12. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Matthew 12. Show all posts

Saturday, July 24, 2021

Jesus Rebukes the Pharisees and Acknowledges His True Brothers and Sisters

Continuing a Bible study of the gospel accounts:

(Matthew 12:22) Then was brought to Him one possessed with a devil, blind and dumb; and He healed him so that the blind and dumb both spoke and saw.

Chapter 12 of Matthew is rather long, so I divided it into two posts.  In the first part of Matthew 12, Jesus continued teaching and healing.  He had withdrawn from the city to avoid the evil schemes of the Pharisees as it was not yet time for His suffering and death.  The account in Mark stated that He withdrew to the sea of Galilee.  It was there people brought to Him a person that was demon-possessed and blind and unable to speak.  Jesus healed the man and he could both see and speak.

(23) And all the people were amazed and said, "Is this not the Son of David?"

The people were amazed at this healing, and began to ask among themselves if Jesus was the Son of David, meaning their long-awaited Messiah, the Son of David.

(24) But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, "This man does not cast out devils except by Beelzebub, the prince of the devils."

Leave it to the judgmental and probably envious Pharisees, when they heard of the incident, to say that Jesus could only cast out devils by the power of Satan, the prince of the devils.  Why the one who possessed people with demons would want to remove them seems a paradox.  The Pharisees could not deny that Jesus did, in fact, perform miracles, but they felt they had to explain it away somehow, and this was the best they could do.

(25) And Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, "Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand."

Although the Pharisees obviously did not say it to Jesus, He knew their thoughts.  He told them that every kingdom divided against itself would be destroyed (from within); every city or house divided against itself would not stand.  I can't help but think about the situation with our country at this present time.  We are a divided country, and unfortunately, it seems our very leaders are stoking the flames of division so that we will indeed fall.

(26) "And if Satan casts out Satan, he is divided against himself; how then shall his kingdom stand?"

Jesus's point, of course, was that if Satan cast himself out, he was certainly divided, and his kingdom would not be able to stand.

(27) "And if I, by Beelzebub, cast out devils, by whom do your children cast them out? Therefore they shall be your judges."

Jesus went on to ask them, that if it were true that He cast out devils by Beelzebub, then by whom did their children, their disciples, exorcise demons?  He asserted they would be the judges of this issue.  The point was, of course, that if He worked for Satan, then so would the disciples of the Pharisees who also cast out devils.  Those disciples would tell them by whom it was that they could cast out demons; in that the Pharisees' absurd accusation would be judged.

(28) "But if I cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God has come to you."

However, Jesus continued, if He cast out devils by the Spirit of God, then no doubt, the kingdom of God had come to them, as both He and John the Baptist had declared was at hand.  If God expelled Satan from his dominion over people, then His reign had indeed come. 

(29) "Or else how can one enter into a strong man's house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man? And then he will plunder his house."

In this, Jesus was speaking of Himself coming into the strong man's house, that world where the prince of darkness ruled, and plundering his goods, his possessed souls.  He could only take those souls if He had bound Satan, the strong man.  By His casting out of demons and healing, He proved that He had bound Satan who had possessed the demon-possessed, and therefore, He must be from God.

(30) "He who is not with Me is against Me, and He who does not gather with Me scatters abroad."

In this, Jesus was saying that there was no neutral territory, no riding of the fence.  One must be fully with Christ, or he is against Him.  Christ is the good shepherd who gathers His sheep, souls, to Him.  Satan is the wolf who scatters the sheep.  Those who do not work with Christ to do His work and gather souls, is in league with Satan and helping to scatter souls.  

(31) "Therefore I say to you, all manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven men."

Jesus told them that all manner of sin and even blasphemy would be forgiven men, that is, of course, if they repented, but blaspheming the Holy Spirit would not be forgiven.  In this case, that was attributing those miracles to the power of the devil, those things they consciously knew were the works of the Holy Spirit.

(32) "And whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but whoever speaks against the Holy Ghost, it will not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come."

Jesus said that even speaking against Him, Christ Jesus, it could be forgiven if the perpetrator repented, but speaking against the Holy Spirit would never be forgiven.  I think it's amazing that one could blaspheme Jesus and be forgiven, but not the Holy Spirit.  I believe that is because to blaspheme the Holy Spirit, one has to know Him.  An unsaved person might blaspheme the person of Jesus, but the Holy Spirit comes after that person has received salvation in Jesus.  To blaspheme the Holy Spirit once a person knows that Spirit of God, would be to reject that Spirit that has once inhabited that soul; that seems to be the unpardonable sin, according to Jesus.  The Holy Spirit wouldn't have actually dwelt in these Pharisees yet; He would come after Jesus's death and resurrection.  However, these men knew in their hearts that Jesus's miracles were by the Holy Spirit of God, yet they attributed them to Satan.  Additionally, Jesus knew the hearts of men, and knew whether they would have blasphemed the Holy Spirit had He dwelt in them; and they most assuredly would have because they were trying to accuse Jesus.

(33) "Either make the tree good and its fruit good, or else make the tree corrupt and its fruit corrupt, for a tree is known by its fruit."

The original word "poieo" that was translated as "make" actually has more of the sense of "agree".  Rather than actually actively making a tree and its fruit good or bad, the sense is that they should agree that either both the tree and its fruit are good, or they both are bad.  If the fruit is good, then so is the tree; if the fruit is bad, then the tree is said to be bad.  Therefore one can tell whether or not a tree is good by its fruit.  They should know Jesus by His fruits; by converting sinners to God, they must know that He is good and was sent by God.

(34) "O generation of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak good things? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks."

Jesus called the Pharisees vipers--deceitful, hurtful, poisonous creatures.  Therefore, how could they, being evil, possibly say good things?  While they might sometimes speak things that sounded good, it wouldn't take long for their speech to betray them.  That is because they could not help but speak what was within their hearts.  They might try to deceive, but hypocrites at length will betray themselves with their own mouths.

(35) "A good man out of the good treasure of his heart brings forth good things, and an evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth evil things."

The original word "ekballo" which was translated as "brings forth" actually has a more forceful meaning, "eject".  A good man with a good heart can't help but spontaneously speak the good things of his heart, which obviously come from the Spirit of God.  Likewise, an evil man with an evil heart will undoubtedly spew out evil things.

(36) "But I say to you that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give an account of it in the day of judgment."

Wow!  Jesus said, not only profane and blasphemous words, but idle words, vain unprofitable talk, thoughtless and useless and not edifying, would have to be explained in the day of judgment.  This seems to encompass the commandments against taking the Lord's name in vain and bearing false witness against one's neighbor, as well as gossip, about which the Bible has a lot to say.

(37) "For by your words you shall be justified, and by your words you shall be condemned."

Words indicate the state of the heart, and we know that God judges the hearts of men; therefore it becomes obvious that by a man's words, he will be judged by God.

(38) Then certain of the scribes and of the Pharisees answered, saying, "Master, we want to see a sign from you."

According to this same account in Luke, these were not the same Pharisees, but others who asked Jesus for a sign from heaven to prove that He truly was from God.  They called Him "Master," but the word more usually meant "Teacher."

(39) But He answered and said to them, "An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign; and there shall be no sign given to it but the sign of the prophet Jonah."

Jesus called them an adulterous generation, meaning their hearts wandered away from God and to the lusts of the world.  They didn't need another sign!  They had already seen enough to know He was from God.  Had their hearts not been estranged from God, they would have had no doubts and would not have desired another sign.  There would be no other sign given to them personally at this time; He did not mean that He would do no more miracles, but that He would do none to prove Himself to them.  There was one sign already given by the prophet Jonah, and when Jesus fulfilled the act of which Jonah's was a symbol, they would have the ultimate sign; not that He wished to prove Himself to them, but they would then be condemned for their unbelief.  Jesus went on to explain how Jonah had been a sign:

(40) "For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the whale's belly, so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."

Jonah was three days in the whale's belly and came out again, and so would Jesus be three days in the earth and would then rise again.  "Three days and three nights" is not to be taken literally as three full days and three full nights; that was just the way the Jews described a day.

(41) "The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it, because they repented at the teaching of Jonah, and behold, a greater than Jonah is here."

The men of Nineveh would rise before the judgment seat of God, along with the present generation of men.  Those Pharisees would be condemned by the example of the men of Nineveh who repented at the teaching of Jonah, because they refused to repent when they were in the presence of one greater than Jonah.

(42) "The queen of the south shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it, for she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon; and behold, a greater than Solomon is here."

The queen of Sheba, as she was called in Kings 10:1, would also stand in judgment with that present generation, and her actions would also condemn them.  She came from the farthest coast of Arabia at the mouth of the Arabian Sea to hear the wisdom of Solomon.  These Pharisees had one greater than Solomon right in the midst of them, but they refused to believe.

(43) "When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walks through dry places, seeking rest, and finds none."

Jesus went on to tell of an unclean spirit, a demonic spirit, that had been driven out of a man, and how it walked in dry places looking for rest.  A demonic spirit cannot find rest in the company of Christians with the Holy Spirit.

(44) "Then he says, 'I will return to my house from which I came.' And when he comes, he finds it empty, swept, and garnished."

The unclean spirit decided to return to the soul of the man he had been driven out of, and when he returned he found it empty; there was no spirit there, no Holy Spirit of God.  Oh, it was clean and in order, with the disorder driven away with the unclean spirit, but there was none in its place.  Oh, it was decorated with showy trifles of morality, perhaps observance of some external rites and ceremonies, and a few hypocritical performances of fasting and prayer; but that was all it was--decorations for show.

(45) Then he goes and takes with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there; and the last state of that man is worse than the first. So shall it be also to this wicked generation."

The unclean spirit brings seven more spirits more wicked than himself into the soul of the man.  Seven is a number that meant perfection, or in this case, fullness.  It is not to be taken literally, but just means many more were brought in to bring that man to a worse state than he was in before.  Jesus said it was so for that present generation.  Here they had Jesus, God Himself, in their midst, and He drove away their evil spirits, but they would not totally embrace Him.  So great was their love for the world that they quickly returned to a wickedness much greater than before.  Their vain outward displays of religion were like the house built on sand that Jesus spoke of back in Matthew 7:26-27; it was easily demolished by the floods of the world.  "And great was its fall" (Matthew 7:27b).

(46) While He still talked to the people, behold, His mother and His brothers stood outside, desiring to speak with Him.

At this time, Jesus's mother Mary and His brothers stood outside, either outside a house that He had gone into, or outside the multitudes that had crowded around Him.  They wanted to speak to Him.  The Catholic teaching is that these were not actually Jesus's "brothers" but were just kinsmen.  It is true that often "brother" is used to denote a family relationship, but not necessarily a brother.  However, there are several other verses that speak of Jesus's brothers, and even sisters.  The Catholics go to great lengths to make Mary holy and untouched by man, but there is no clear evidence of this, nor is it necessary.  Jesus was the firstborn son, and He was not actually the son of Joseph, but was the Son of God by immaculate conception of Mary.  It is quite reasonable to believe that Joseph and Mary went on to have more children, who would have been half-siblings to Jesus, because they all had the same mother, but Jesus's biological father was not Joseph.  Jesus having half-siblings, in no way diminishes who He is.  It can only diminish Mary in the eyes of the Catholics who have to read into scripture things that are simply not there.  There is no reason not to take scripture at face value here.

(47) Then one said to Him, "Behold, Your mother and Your brothers stand outside, desiring to speak with You."

Someone within the group of people informed Jesus that His mother and brothers were standing outside wishing to speak with Him.

(48) But He answered and said to him who told Him, "Who is My mother and who are My brothers?"

Obviously, Jesus knew who His mother and brothers were, but He posed this question to the people.

(49) And He stretched forth His hand toward His disciples and said, "Behold My mother and My brothers! (50) For whoever shall do the will of My Father Who is in heaven, the same is My brother, sister, and mother."

Jesus then stretched His hands out motioning to His disciples, which might have meant more than just the twelve, and declared that they were His closest kin, His mother, brothers, and sisters.  Those who truly follow God are His children and therefore brothers and sisters to Christ Jesus.  We are not told about Him meeting with His mother and brothers, and what their conversation was about.  The fact that He did not immediately run to them is not to be seen as disrespectful.  There are too many other passages that show His deep respect for His mother.  Jesus, knowing the thoughts of man, already knew what it was that they wanted, and He chose to make a point rather than interrupt His teaching.  After all, it only took a minute or two to finish His point.  And that was that the business of God was more important than even the closest biological family.  Jesus had said that before in Matthew 10:37, that whoever loved his father or mother or son or daughter more than Him was not worthy of Him.  This was also great encouragement to the followers of Christ that they were as dear to Him, even dearer, than His own biological family.

Most of this post dealt with the wicked ways of the Pharisees and scribes--their blasphemy in accusing Jesus of working for Satan, their unwarranted request for more signs, how they may be known by the fruits of their actions, and how those who accepted God's truth when they didn't even have the advantage of Christ in their midst, would stand in judgment against them.  However, this chapter has a happy ending; those who follow Jesus are very dear to Him, and He loves them more than He loves even His very own mother!  Of course, His mother was His follower, too, but for others who may have family who reject Christ, He told us that we are His dear family if we look first to Him above family.

Sunday, June 27, 2021

Jesus Is Lord of the Sabbath

Continuing a study of the gospels:

(Matthew 12:1) At that time Jesus went on the sabbath day through the corn; and His disciples were hungry and began to pluck the ears of corn and to eat.

In the last post, the disciples of John the Baptist had come to Jesus inquiring if He was the expected Messiah.  Jesus took that time to give a tribute to John, and then went on to call the weary and heavily burdened to Him, saying His yoke was easy and His burden was light.  It was during this time of His preaching and teaching that He and His disciples walked through cornfields on the Sabbath.  His disciples were hungry and began to pluck and eat ears of corn.

(2) But when the Pharisees saw it, they said to Him, "Behold, Your disciples do what is not lawful to do on the sabbath day."

The Pharisees, who seemed to be following and watching, saw Jesus's disciples pluck and eat the corn, and told Jesus they were doing what was unlawful to do on the Sabbath.  I always knew that Jesus taught the spirit of the law rather than the strict legalistic adherence to it, but as it turns out, the old commentaries that I study point out that this act was indeed lawful.  It was not lawful for a man to tend to or even visit to inspect his own fields on the Sabbath.  However, in Deuteronomy 23:25, it was stated that when a man came to the cornfield of a neighbor, he was allowed to take what he could by hand, meaning only what sufficed for the present necessity.  That was not considered work, whereas a man inspecting and plucking his own corn was viewed as working or tending his fields.

(3) But He said to them, "Have you not read what David did when he was hungry, and those who were with him?"

Jesus turned a recrimination back to the Pharisees asking if they had ever read the scripture about David and those with him at a time when they were hungry...

(4) "How he entered into the house of God and ate the showbread which was not lawful for him to eat, neither for them who were with him, but only for the priests?"

Jesus went on to tell that David had entered the tabernacle, for the temple was not yet built, and he and those with him ate the showbread that was on the golden table before the Lord, that was only to be eaten by the priests.  No example could be more relevant than David, a man after God's own heart (Acts 13:22), of whom the Jews boasted, when suffering in God's cause and in need of provisions, ate the showbread that was illegal for anyone but priests to eat.

(5) "Or have you not read in the law that on the sabbath days the priests in the temple profane the Sabbath and are blameless?"

Jesus asked the Pharisees if they had read in the law that on sabbath days the priests in the temple did servile work doing God's service in the temple, but they were blameless.

(6) "But I say to you, that in this place there is one greater than the temple."

Jesus told the Pharisees that in that particular place and time, there was something greater than the temple, of course, meaning Himself who was Lord of the temple, and the temple had actually been a sort of symbol of Him.

(7) "But if you had known what this means, 'I will have mercy and not sacrifice,' you would not have condemned the guiltless."

Jesus again quoted the scripture in Hosea 6:6, which He had once in Matthew 9:13 told the Pharisees to go and learn.  The meaning is that when the two interfered with each other, God always preferred mercy to legalistic ceremonial acts.  The law was merely a means of religion, whereas love was the ultimate goal of it.  If the Pharisees had learned the meaning of that scripture in Hosea, they would not have condemned His disciples.

(8) "For the Son of man is Lord even of the sabbath day."

Jesus was Lord of all, even the Sabbath.  After all, the sabbath day was a symbol of the sabbath rest in Him, stated in Hebrews 4:10, "For he who has entered into His rest, he also has ceased from his own works, as God did from His."

(9) And when He was departed from there, He went into their synagogue.

When Jesus departed from the cornfields and His conversation with the Pharisees, He went into their synagogue.  He may have gone immediately from the cornfields to the synagogue on that same day, but Luke stated in his account that the following took place on another sabbath day.

(10) And behold, there was a man who had a withered hand. And they asked Him, saying, "Is it lawful to heal on the sabbath days?"--that they might accuse Him.

There was a man there with a withered hand.  The Pharisees asked Jesus if it was lawful to heal on the Sabbath, but their intentions were not to learn, but to trap Him.

(11) And He said to them, "What man is there among you who has one sheep, and if it falls into a pit on the sabbath day, would not lay hold of it and lift it out?"

Jesus then asked the Pharisees a question about a situation that might easily happen to any of them.  Was there any of them who, if he had a sheep, and it fell into a pit on the Sabbath, would not lift it out of the pit.

(12) "How much then is a man more valuable than a sheep? Therefore it is lawful to do good on the sabbath days."

Jesus pointed out that a man was of much more value than a sheep, so it was definitely lawful to do for man what one would do for his sheep.  Once again, Jesus taught the spirit of the law.  It was not to be taken so literally and strictly that by observing it, one would actually do harm, as to destroy a life or allow it to be destroyed, when he had it within his power to save it.

(13) Then He said to the man, "Stretch forth your hand." And he stretched it forth, and it was restored whole as the other.

Jesus told the man with the withered hand to stretch it out, and when he did, it was restored and just like his other hand.  The act of stretching forth his hand might have been just to show that his hand was healed, but I believe there might have been a little more to it.  In this case, we don't have evidence of the man's faith in Jesus; from what was written, we don't see that the man sought out Jesus to heal him.  Jesus and the Pharisees just saw the man and the Pharisees used him to test Jesus.  Jesus had the man stretch forth his hand.  I believe that was to show faith in Jesus that He might heal him.  He could just as easily have kept his hand to himself if he believed the Pharisees and thought he would be engaging in an unlawful act.

(14) Then the Pharisees went out and held a council against Him, how they might destroy Him.

The Pharisees then went out and held a meeting to plot against Jesus, how they might destroy Him.  Imagine that!  There was no regard for the life that was healed, but only judgment and perhaps envy in their hard wicked hearts to destroy the one who did only good on the Sabbath.  

(15) But when Jesus knew it, He withdrew Himself from there; and great multitudes followed Him, and He healed them all.

Jesus knew the hearts of men and their thoughts, so when He realized what the Pharisees were doing, He withdrew from the synagogue and the city to the sea of Galilee, so says Mark in his account.  Jesus did not withdraw because of fear, but because it was not yet time for Him to suffer and die.  Adam Clarke, in his Commentary on the Bible, explained how this was a good example for Christians.  We don't retreat in fear, but if by withdrawing, we take away the occasion for the other party to sin, that is a good thing.  There is no reason to purposely provoke.  We are not to fear persecution, but as our aim should be only to do good, if we can prevent sin and go on to do more good, then we should.  However, if there comes a time when we must choose God or evil, we of course, choose God, even if it means persecution and death.  Withdrawing from such situations is often humbling; we must not let our pride get the best of us and cause sin and persecution, when peacefully withdrawing would do good.  When Jesus left, multitudes of people followed after Him, and He healed them all.  

(16) And charged them that they should not make Him known.

Once again, Jesus warned those He healed not to tell of their miraculous healing, or at least not reveal Him as the healer.  Again, it is not because He feared what would happen to Him if they told, but it was not yet time for His suffering and death.

(17) That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying, (18) "Behold, My servant whom I have chosen, My beloved, in whom My soul is well pleased. I will put my spirit upon Him and He will show judgment to the Gentiles."

That charge to not make Him yet known was to fulfill the prophecy in Isaiah 42:1 that He would share the entire Christian system of truth and judgment to the Gentiles, not just the Jews.  Matthew, in quoting this prophecy, showed the reason why Jesus withdrew.  The Jews had been expecting their Messiah to be a conqueror, but instead of being a brave warrior, He was withdrawing.

(19) "He shall not strive, nor cry; neither will any man hear His voice in the streets. (20) A bruised reed He shall not break, and smoking flax He will not quench, till He sends forth judgment to victory; (21) And in His name shall the Gentiles trust."

Matthew went on to quote the rest of Isaiah's prophecy in Isaiah 42:2-4.  The Messiah would not come fighting and shouting for battle.  He would not come oppressing the poor and feeble.  Whereas one rough touch might break a bruised reed or quench a flickering smoking flax, His touch would be tender and loving to lift up the meek.  He would not further oppress those who had little strength; He would not quench the hope and life when it seemed to be almost extinct.  He would not be like the Pharisees, proud and overbearing, and trampling down the poor.  He would not treat them harshly, but would cherish the feeble flame, and kindle it into a blaze, a victory.  The Gentiles would trust in His name.  The original prophecy was that the isles would wait for His law, meaning His gospel would be preached to the Gentiles, those beyond the sea in distant lands. 

This is an especially long chapter, so I will end this post, and finish the chapter in the next one.  The main points in this first half were to show that Jesus was Lord of the Sabbath, and that He fulfilled prophecy.  The entire Old Testament was a foreshadowing of things to come.  The Pharisees took the law so literally, and adhered to it so strictly (most likely when it suited them), that they had lost the original intent of it, which was to bring people closer to the Lord, and to have them love one another.  The Pharisees would not hear Jesus's teaching, but God would have it preached to the Gentile world.  Hallelujah for that!